Board Thread:General Discussion & Requests/@comment-26182781-20160821212435/@comment-33046846-20160823220644

FranceSwitzerland wrote: Phillydan25 wrote: FranceSwitzerland wrote:

Teh Sweggurboi wrote: Let's advance this conversation. Here are my thoughts:

SwitzerlandSoccer = Content Moderator

Aca soccer = The rank he has now is good for him, but because he is already long active, we could give him the rollback rank too. Then he will undo more vandalism while now he doesn't do it often, so that's good.

TTigerTT = Discussion moderator. I know, this sounds too quick, but he joined at the same date as JRFB and has almost the same amount of edits, while JRFB got his rank muh earlier. Also, he is one of the most active users currently.

Fire mummy = I saw him a few times in the chat and he is more active now, but I think it's still too fast to already give him the chat moderator rank back.

CROATIAISTHEBEST = Should become active soon, otherwise he will lose his rank.

Plutosoccer = If he was just a little active, I think we should already give him the rollback rank. He likes the rank and has done a lot for the Wiki in the past. Too bad he is even too inactive for this.

Zero 78 = Is doing good edits, but he said he is leaving soon, so he will probably not go rank up.

Phillydan = He is already discussed, but I think if he continues to edit so much he should be given the rollback rank the next time we discuss ranks. SwitzerlandSoccer = Agreed and I will give him that rank soon.

Aca soccer = Yes that is good for him. I will give him the Rollback rank too.

TTigerTT = Ok I don't know of I am totally agreed with this. He still need to learn a lot with editing, but lets just give him the rank to test it out.

Fire mummy = He seem to be not that active. Only in chat. Lets wait of he continues being active in chat.

CROATIAISTHEBEST = Is really inactive and never in chat. I think we must delete his rank.

Plutosoccer = If he becomes a lot active again, we can give him the Rollback rank. But at now it seems he is too inactive for this.

ZERO 78 = If he leaves, it's useless to give him a higher rank.

Phillydan25 = Hm, I still don't know this. In fact he has broken the rules, but he does also useful edits. I don't know of Rollback is the right rank for this, because he fixes grammar and not revert vandalism. What do you mean about that last part about reverting vandalism? That you never undo the edit when someone have done vandalism. But if we make you a rollback, we could learn you to use your function. Ok. I never undo the vandalism because I don't see any, but for the last part, yeah, sure.