Board Thread:General Discussion & Requests/@comment-33046846-20170818180158/@comment-26272757-20170825055808

Phillydan25 wrote: TheCrimson King208 wrote: But out of 3 guys, 2 are admins. So, like TS says, case closed. Admins are admins. Administrators do not have a special say in discussions. Users and administrators have equal votes.

Then why the heck did I become admin? To not be able to decide anything?

FranceSwitzerland wrote: It's 3v4. FranceSwitzerland, Teh Sweggurboi, Andreskiremy and TheCrimson King208 are 4 users. Okay let me say what will happen: You will create that wiki and spent all your time in moving all ideas into that wiki. After a few weeks, you will find out that it fails as there are no users (or very less) coming to it. We will keep all ideas here on the wiki. They will for sure not be deleted. And after some months you will also stop with the wiki. And then we have another wiki that is inactive like HS FAQ Wiki, but sadly this is needed because there is no other way to let you find out that it is doomed to fail. This is for sure not what I want, but it is sadly needed.

That can't happen, as he is not allowed to delete anything from this Wiki, so therefore the test can't succeed. We must do what's the best for this Wiki. I'm always open for ideas and arguments and it is good that Phil comes up with new ideas, but it shouldn't be that we have to say 10 times that we don't want it and he still doesn't understand it. Also, to be honest, me and FS's arguments are just much better. I haven't heard a single good reason from Phil. Which means we have won this discussion. Most people also agree with us, so a proposal wouldn't make it anyway.