Board Thread:General Discussion & Requests/@comment-26774000-20171007222635/@comment-26182781-20171008105435

Teh Sweggurboi wrote: Sort of 30% neutral and 70% support. I think if you have a higher rank, you can do more things you want, so it will lead our community forward. And you have probably been our most productive user in recent times. However, you still tend to do useless edits every once in a while, edits that aren't necessarily bad, but of which I think: what is the point of doing them. It's like you do everything for being active to show us you should become a Content Moderator. And pages shouldn't be deleted too soon, because then nobody can oppose against their deletion. Not that it happens, but theoretically. But that doesn't affect my decision very much. I still think it's good if you get these rights.

I strongly agree with that about his edits. I don't want to start a discussion, but the reason I'm strongly doubting about this is that Phil's edits are like you said, often not necessary. They aren't bad, but just not necessary. I like it more to have users that do very useful edits, that's also how you and SS became Bureaucrat and Content-moderator. I think it is also because Phil often doesn't knows what to edit and does edits like this to show that he is active. Just tell me it when it is wrong what I say here. I came on the conclusion that it is hard to decide of Phil should be Content-Moderator. I will have to thini longer about it, that's why I'm not voting for sone time.