Board Thread:General Discussion & Requests/@comment-26182781-20170624231238/@comment-33046846-20170625014525

Honestly, the fact that there's a whole problem about me makes me really want to read this. I wouldn't really call them "fights," more like arguments, but hey, let me break this down. This rule isn't terrible, but this prevents having users joining discussions to give their full and honest opinion on an issue or something. This will prevent bad discussion, but will prevent good discussion too, which will hurt the wiki. So, this is a neutral idea that could go either way. Anyway, moving on to the whole argument case. I don't want to have these arguments, I never do, as they make me stressed sometimes and I can get a headache if it's that terrible. That being said, some crap going on between you and me make these discussions happen. These are said to be caused by me complaining, according to some people. And, whenever I get an "example" of me complaining, it's usually something that's not even a complaint, such as the time where I rollbacked an edit on the Movie Ideas Wiki where SS removed some stuff that was grammatically correct. I'm not saying this is the only example, and I'm not saying there was anything wrong on the other party, but it's actually sometimes the user who's on the other side of the discussion who was complaining about a topic. Anyway, back to what I was talking about. I do not condone having these debates, but they are necessary to get a point across, and sometimes that fails, which means that these aren't civil enough and need to improve. Honestly, I have an idea. Let's say there's an administrator having a debate with a regular user. If it gets too heated, there should probably be a rule that another administrator should step in to improve it, or maybe a bureaucrat, but I'm not entirely sure, as an accurate rule for something like this would be pretty damn hard to make, and could have a multitude of possible outcomes. Wow, that paragraph was really long, I need to move on to the next problem.

I'm very sorry, but honestly, we need to organize our administrator/bureaucrat system, and you becoming a regular administrator or something along those lines might be needed to do this. I do not think you are a terrible crat, as you have done your share of bureaucratic work and have promoted users to positions they really deserved and gained a lot of experience from. That being said, though, there have been some times where you have been using your power in favor of yourself. What I mean is that someone has been trying to get a point across, and you think that they are threatening you/disrespecting you or something along the lines of that, so you say something like "you are saying that to a bureaucrat," which I don't think makes the situation better. It actually makes to situation seem a lot worse than it actually it is, but meh, it's not too big of a deal. And you have told users to "shut up" or that they are "idiots," which seems unprofessional and can make users feel unwelcome, which can be terrible to some, since maybe they just made a mistake that most newer FANDOM users sometimes make. This doesn't happen too often, but it does happen every once in a while. I do really appreciate your dedication while working on articles, however, which is a really good plus, seeing that your edits are always positive. I do not think you are doing a terrible job as a bureaucrat. Honestly, I'm not going to decide on this, as I do not have a clear opinion right now. My decently okay ideas would maybe be content moderator or regular administrator, but I am not completely sure what truly is the best option is at the moment. So, I am not deciding on this. Instead, you decide.